Maximum Insurance / Alerts / Divergences

Where Washington, Paris and London do not say the same thing

On 15 August 2026, Maximum Insurance compares the national travel advice published on the same countries by three states: the U.S. Department of State, the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs, and the British Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office. Of 207 readable countries, 42 get a different national advisory depending on the capital asked. Every row quotes the official wording and links to it.

207
Countries compared
at least two sources read
42
Countries in disagreement
15 two bands apart
1
Countries set aside
fewer than two sources read
CountryUnited StatesFranceUnited KingdomGap
Myanmar
2-band gap: the United States and France (formally advised against, whole country) versus the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country). Area-level advice on record: parts of the country on the UK side.
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
formally advised against, whole country
« l’intégralité du territoire birman demeure formellement déconseillée ou déconseillée sauf raisons impératives. »
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
2
bands
DR Congo
2-band gap: the United States (formally advised against, whole country) versus the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country). The French advisory could not be read. Area-level advice on record: parts of the country on the UK side.
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
reading unavailable
our reading: Security page not retrieved right now
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
2
bands
Iraq
2-band gap: the United States (formally advised against, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
2
bands
Iran
2-band gap: the United States and the United Kingdom (formally advised against, whole country) versus France (no national restriction, but red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side.
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
formally advised against, whole country
our reading: advises against ALL travel to the whole country (avoid_all_travel_to_whole_country)
source ↗
2
bands
Lebanon
2-band gap: the United States (formally advised against, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
2
bands
Libya
2-band gap: the United States (formally advised against, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
2
bands
Uganda
2-band gap: the United States (formally advised against, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side.
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restrictionsource ↗2
bands
Central African Republic
2-band gap: the United States and France (formally advised against, whole country) versus the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country). Area-level advice on record: parts of the country on the UK side.
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
formally advised against, whole country
« L’intégralité du territoire est formellement déconseillée ou déconseillée sauf raison impérative. »
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts)
source ↗
2
bands
Somalia
2-band gap: the United States and France (formally advised against, whole country) versus the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country). Area-level advice on record: parts of the country on the UK side.
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
formally advised against, whole country
« totalité du pays, où aucune garantie de sécurité ne peut être donnée et aucune protection systématique ne peut être assurée en cas de besoin. »
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts)
source ↗
2
bands
Sudan
2-band gap: the United States and France (formally advised against, whole country) versus the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country). Area-level advice on record: parts of the country on the UK side.
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
formally advised against, whole country
« l’ensemble du territoire soudanais, y compris à Khartoum et à Port-Soudan. »
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts)
source ↗
2
bands
Chad
2-band gap: the United States (formally advised against, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts)
source ↗
2
bands
Ukraine
2-band gap: the United States and France (formally advised against, whole country) versus the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country). Area-level advice on record: parts of the country on the UK side.
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
formally advised against, whole country
« l’intégralité du territoire ukrainien est formellement déconseillé. »
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
2
bands
United Arab Emirates
2-band gap: France (formally advised against, whole country) versus the United Kingdom (no national restriction).
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
formally advised against, whole country
« L’intégralité du pays est en zone de vigilance renforcée, à l’exception des îles Grande Tomb et Petite Tomb et Abou Moussa qui font l’objet d’un… »
source ↗
no national restrictionsource ↗2
bands
Ethiopia
2-band gap: France (formally advised against, whole country) versus the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country). Area-level advice on record: parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
formally advised against, whole country
« l’ensemble du territoire. »
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
2
bands
Cameroon
2-band gap: France (formally advised against, whole country) versus the United States and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country). Area-level advice on record: parts of the country on the UK side.
no national restriction
« Exercise Increased Caution »
source ↗
formally advised against, whole country
« tout déplacement dans la presqu’île de Bakassi est formellement déconseillé, compte tenu de l’isolement et des problèmes d’insécurité liés notamment… »
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
2
bands
North Korea
1-band gap: the United States and France (formally advised against, whole country) versus the United Kingdom (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country).
formally advised against, whole country
« Do Not Travel »
source ↗
formally advised against, whole country
« L’intégralité du territoire nord-coréen est formellement déconseillée (rouge sur la carte des Conseils aux voyageurs). »
source ↗
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
our reading: advises against all but essential travel to the whole country (avoid_all_but_essential_travel_to_whole_country)
source ↗
1
band
Saudi Arabia
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
1
band
Azerbaijan
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
1
band
Bahrain
1-band gap: the United States and the United Kingdom (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France (no national restriction).
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction
our reading: no advised-against area
source ↗
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
our reading: advises against all but essential travel to the whole country (avoid_all_but_essential_travel_to_whole_country)
source ↗
1
band
Bangladesh
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all but essential travel to parts (avoid_all_but_essential_travel_to_parts)
source ↗
1
band
Burundi
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts)
source ↗
1
band
Colombia
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all but essential travel to parts (avoid_all_but_essential_travel_to_parts)
source ↗
1
band
Guatemala
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country). Area-level advice on record: parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction
our reading: no advised-against area
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all but essential travel to parts (avoid_all_but_essential_travel_to_parts)
source ↗
1
band
Guinea-Bissau
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus the United Kingdom (no national restriction). The French advisory could not be read.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
reading unavailable
our reading: Security page not retrieved right now
source ↗
no national restrictionsource ↗1
band
Guyana
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restrictionsource ↗1
band
Honduras
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but orange zones). Area-level advice on record: orange zones on the French side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ orange zones
our reading: areas advised against except for imperative reasons (orange)
source ↗
no national restrictionsource ↗1
band
Jordan
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
1
band
Kuwait
1-band gap: the United States and the United Kingdom (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France (no national restriction, but red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
our reading: advises against all but essential travel to the whole country (avoid_all_but_essential_travel_to_whole_country)
source ↗
1
band
Macau
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus the United Kingdom (no national restriction). The French advisory could not be read.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
reading unavailable
our reading: Security page not retrieved right now
source ↗
no national restrictionsource ↗1
band
Mauritania
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts)
source ↗
1
band
Nicaragua
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but orange zones). Area-level advice on record: orange zones on the French side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ orange zones
our reading: areas advised against except for imperative reasons (orange)
source ↗
no national restrictionsource ↗1
band
Nigeria
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
1
band
Oman
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction).
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction
our reading: no advised-against area
source ↗
no national restrictionsource ↗1
band
Pakistan
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
1
band
Papua New Guinea
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but orange zones and parts of the country). Area-level advice on record: orange zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ orange zones
our reading: areas advised against except for imperative reasons (orange)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all but essential travel to parts (avoid_all_but_essential_travel_to_parts)
source ↗
1
band
Qatar
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction).
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction
our reading: no advised-against area
source ↗
no national restrictionsource ↗1
band
Rwanda
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country). Area-level advice on record: parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction
our reading: no advised-against area
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all but essential travel to parts (avoid_all_but_essential_travel_to_parts)
source ↗
1
band
São Tomé and Príncipe
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction).
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction
our reading: no advised-against area
source ↗
no national restrictionsource ↗1
band
Tanzania
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all but essential travel to parts (avoid_all_but_essential_travel_to_parts)
source ↗
1
band
Trinidad and Tobago
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction).
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction
our reading: no advised-against area
source ↗
no national restrictionsource ↗1
band
Venezuela
1-band gap: the United States (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus France and the United Kingdom (no national restriction, but parts of the country and red zones). Area-level advice on record: red zones on the French side and parts of the country on the UK side.
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
« Reconsider Travel »
source ↗
no national restriction+ red zones
our reading: areas formally advised against (red)
source ↗
no national restriction+ parts of the country
our reading: advises against all travel to parts of the country (avoid_all_travel_to_parts) · advises against all but essential travel to parts…
source ↗
1
band
Cuba
1-band gap: the United Kingdom (advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country) versus the United States and France (no national restriction).
no national restriction
« Exercise Increased Caution »
source ↗
no national restriction
our reading: no advised-against area
source ↗
advised against except for imperative reasons, whole country
our reading: advises against all but essential travel to the whole country (avoid_all_but_essential_travel_to_whole_country)
source ↗
1
band

Reading of 15 August 2026. Three official sources, read every day, quoted word for word.

Countries set aside for want of a reading

For these countries, at least two of the three advisories could not be read today. They count neither as agreement nor as disagreement — naming them is the only way to make the counter verifiable.

How to read this table

The three scales are not comparable as they stand. The U.S. State Department publishes four levels mixing crime, terrorism and conflict; France publishes a Security page where AREAS are classified red or orange, and sometimes an advisory covering the whole country; the United Kingdom publishes textual statuses. To place them side by side, we keep only what they share: the NATIONAL travel restriction, on three bands.

Areas are never folded into the band. A country where France classifies a border strip as red is not a country formally advised against: the scope is geographic. Such advisories appear as a qualifier next to the band ("red zones", "orange zones", "parts of the country"), never inside it. Without that separation, dozens of ordinary countries would show maximum disagreement with Washington — a disagreement manufactured by our own reading.

An unreadable source is never read as "no advisory". It is taken out of the calculation, and named. A country is compared as soon as two sources have been read: a disagreement between two states is still a disagreement if the third could not be retrieved, and the row summary then says which one is missing. Below two readings the country leaves the table and the counters entirely — it appears by name in the list of set-aside countries further down. A failed reading — moved page, unknown status, partial response — says nothing about a state's position; inferring "no advisory" from it would publish a clearance nobody gave. For the same reason, a British status we cannot translate voids the reading instead of being ignored.

The table above lists disagreements only. The exports carry every country, including those where all three capitals agree and those excluded, with the reason.

Reusing this data

This comparison is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0), like the site's other datasets. You may copy, quote, republish and use it commercially, including modified, on one condition: credit the source and link to it.

How to credit

Minimum attribution, as text or link:

Source: Maximum Insurance — maximum-insurance.com/divergences, CC BY 4.0

Both exports, with no key and no account: /divergences.csv · /divergences.json

Upstream sources: U.S. Department of State (federal government work, public domain), France Diplomatie and the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (Open Government Licence v3, commercial use allowed). The three-band normalisation is our editorial work, and it is what you are citing.

Full CC BY 4.0 licence text →

Frequently asked questions

Why don't the United States, France and the United Kingdom give the same advice on a country?

Because a travel advisory is an act of foreign policy as much as a risk assessment: it depends on the issuing state's diplomatic presence, on how many of its nationals are on the ground and who they are, on bilateral relations, and on its own rating scale. The three administrations often read the same facts and draw different instructions from them.

How can three different scales be compared?

They are reduced to the only quantity they share: the NATIONAL travel restriction, on three bands — no general restriction, advised against except for imperative reasons, formally advised against. Advisories that only target areas within a country stay visible alongside, as a qualifier, and never count as a national restriction.

Is a country with French red zones "formally advised against"?

No. France can classify a border strip as red without advising against the country: the scope is geographic, not national. Conflating the two would manufacture disagreements that do not exist, and would suggest a whole country is off limits. The table keeps them apart, row by row.

Which source should I follow when the three disagree?

The one your policy names. Most French policies refer to the Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs; Anglo-Saxon policies cite the FCDO. A disagreement between capitals voids no cover by itself — your policy's clause, and the source it designates, are what decide.

May I republish this table?

Yes. The dataset is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (CC BY 4.0): copying, quoting, republishing and commercial use are allowed, including modified, provided you credit Maximum Insurance and link to the page. The CSV and JSON exports need no key and no account.

Going further

tsmInsurance company · Switzerland, 1921
AXAAssistance — 40,000 providers
GARDAWORLDCrisis management & security
MAXIMUMINSURANCE

Travel insurance for leaders. Swiss insurer since 1921. 24/7, worldwide.

TSM Compagnie d'Assurances (1921) · AXA Assistance · GardaWorld

24/7 emergency
+41 22 819 44 66
operations@tsm-assistance.com
Solutions
Travel information
Member area
Partner area